feedback

After showing people our final product we received some very positive criticism however also felt rewarded by people for our work.Some of the following comments were made;
- Our target audience was 15-24, this was recognised by our audience, they felt it was meant for a youthful audience as the actors were young and they felt the editing was fast pace. They also felt that it was intended for a middle class socio-economic grouping due to the mise-en-scene of the house and the actors regional accent. However it was expressed that it could gain audience of an older age as in the early twenties due to the narrative.
- As the cast were women that were shown, it was commented that the beginning could be signified as being a chick flick and if we were to do it again this is something we would need to work on. The fact that it had no men in as well meant that it was questioned that women had no male gaze theory.
- The lighting of the outside shots were effective and worked well with the narrative
- The narrative enigma at the end pf the film was said to be a 'good unexpected twist'
- The jerky camera style while following the 'final girl' made it more believable
- When the camera was following the girl it was effective and built tension how there was no sound yet you could still hear the footsteps.
- However comments were made that the wind was picked up by the microphone which gave unwanted ambient sound.
- Watching the girl walk out of the house signified that someone was watching her and set up the narrative well